🎰 Загрузите и играйте

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🔥

Filter:
Sort:
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Received an email that my account had been frozen for a security review and i want to thank pokerstars for the supporting me thru playing procces, special.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Received an email that my account had been frozen for a security review and i want to thank pokerstars for the supporting me thru playing procces, special.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

May 28, by Kae-West on PokerStars Review. Contacted chat support. Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Complaints against PokerStars Casino, that include payout, withdrawal, deposit, PokerStars Casino - After deposit account frozen and no reply from support.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

If, however, you have a complaint, you can lodge it in the following way: Step 1: Contact Support and provide as much details as you can. Our customer service.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

May 28, by Kae-West on PokerStars Review. Contacted chat support. Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Received an email that my account had been frozen for a security review and i want to thank pokerstars for the supporting me thru playing procces, special.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The latest Tweets from PokerStars Support (@StarsSupport). Daily support for @​PokerStars players 18+ 12pm-8pm (GMT). Visit promo.opt-modaya.ru for.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Received an email that my account had been frozen for a security review and i want to thank pokerstars for the supporting me thru playing procces, special.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

💰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

To contact us, choose one of the links to our contact page available in our Help Centers, desktop software, and mobile apps. From there, choose the reason for.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
support pokerstars complaints

For some, this data was evidence that PokerStars was rigging standard games or at least that the dealer mechanism was not random. Although user names were stripped, hand logs are publicly available, and it is possible to associate individual players with the released data. PokerStars turns a profit on every real-money player no matter how much he or she wins. The biggest online poker site in the world at the time, PartyPoker, immediately accepted and followed this new US law, and left the USA market. Its bad enought that its possible to predict that its likely when playing to know almost every time what card will arrive to beat you so they can finish their dodgy tournaments quicker but now money is disappearing from my account its a complete scam. If PokerStars is willing to do this to their business partners, then what are they willing to do to their players? It would have been way to obvious. To this day, countless players and business partners are owed money from Full Tilt. I do not believe the site is rigged in regards to cheating because it makes no sense as previously stated by others. The nature of online play, however, is that it is more difficult for a pro player to be consistently successful. In addition, VIP rewards are earned based on the amount staked not the amount won or lost. If you win a big tournament, what prevents PokerStars from immediately changing their terms to not pay you out?! River cards that have become predictable. I have won 1 of those. All this talking about rigged poker clients. Sorry, but we have to call it. PokerStars did not fully satisfy these commitments even though they now own and are responsible for the Full Tilt brand. This was true prior to the UIGEA, and it is true even now in the states where the brand has a legal presence. On April 15, , the Department of Justice seized the pokerstars.

SincePokerStars has been among the most prominent online poker brands. PokerStars spends a lot of money on its sponsorships, and it behooves the brand to have these professional players be successful. On May 1,PokerStars unilaterally changed the terms to only compensate their marketing partners for only two years.

Amaya increased the support pokerstars complaints at PokerStars this web page late !

Then it happens. The BBB does track international support pokerstars complaints, however, and although it has not accredited or rated PokerStars, it does have a file for the company in nearly support pokerstars complaints state.

PokerStars has been in business for over 15 years. Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. PokerStars does not want money leaving the system, so players that earn profits and routinely withdraw cash from the site are not good for the site.

Rigged or not? What this means is that marketing partners that have been supporting and promoting PokerStars for years and years will lose all revenues from those players.

On May 1,PokerStars sent an email to its online marketing partners drastically changing the terms of their agreements, causing significant damage to all of their Internet partners for their own benefit. Getting low in stack. After watching my account depleted repeatedly, I started support pokerstars complaints document my play.

On April 20, the pokerstars. The company lost a lot of money and a significant portion of its customer base. The company is located in the Isle of Man and acquired a European Union gambling license through Malta. Favor a player to win — or themselves to get rich? Amaya does not care about the players or the business partners of PokerStars.

The one statisticwhich is so glaring is this one. Pocket deuces. I could be wrong, but it sure doesn't seem as it plays out that way. They will only get compensated for players from the past support pokerstars complaints years.

The most egregious act destroying any remaining goodwill PokerStars may have had came very recently. Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to google maps with the smallest issue.

We believe that all of these poor decisions stemmed from the fact that PokerStars decided to break US law by continuing to offer their services to Americans. You start to lose consistently.

A much bigger concern of whether PokerStars games are rigged is whether the company is actually cheating players out of winnings. Amaya added a 2. I do not believe any clients to be rigged — like that. Or give Aces or Kings way to often to whatever player, or never?

Full Tilt Poker had rampant cheating going — and this is a fact. So, I guess the real question to ask when considering if, and how, online poker clients are rigging their platforms, and how to do the correct analyze of all billion hands and maybe getting on step closer be able to? There are a significant number of complaints on file, and we urge everyone to check with their local BBB to consider local experiences with the PokerStars brand.

The most concerning question about PokerStars is whether the service is rigged. In doing so, PokerStars breached vegas osheas casino nevada las privacy contract with its players.

PokerStars is a scam. Admittedly, there is some compelling video evidence on YouTube of sponsored PokerStars players beating the odds on multiple occasions during a number of big events. Although the company started as a play-money service only, the focus has been on real-money poker for more than a decade.

I love the believers who drank the cool aidwho try and spew the same crap.

Marketing partners of PokerStars had an agreement — that they would receive a certain percentage of the revenues that PokerStars earned off players referred by that partner.

We feel this choice started PokerStars down a road of shadiness which leads us to our opinion today — that PokerStars is a scam. And the losses are so laughable and obvious. And that revenue share plan would persist for the life of the player. Basically, this is a breach of contract and PokerStars is more than willing to completely screw their partners.

Therefore, PokerStars has motivation, and the company has chosen to ignore rather than dispute the video evidence. The revenues that PokerStars earns is based on the total pot no matter who wins it.

Runner runner everything. Create your own review. In fact, PokerStars purchased Full Tilt Poker and continues to manage and operate this brand — a brand that is synonymous with the term ponzi scheme.

In both alternatives, the big stack seems to be the winner most of the times, no matter what two cards the players have. Prior to the seizure, PokerStars could not legally provide service to U.

And this new change of ownership has led to the issues we see today. A quick search online will reveal a sharp increase in the last several years of players making complaints about having their accounts seized, bankrolls reduced when making a withdrawal, withdrawals refused, bonuses voided for no reason and so forth.

Over hundreds of hand i had AK hole cards 32 times. It is worth noting that there were at least two independent analyses of the PokerStars dealer mechanism that presented data outside the norm.

Simply put if I can predict all my losses I should not be playing in this medium. Happens to everyone from time to time. And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to be normal regularity?

Associating with the owners — the Scheinbergs — prevented PokerStars from entering US markets, which eventually led to the sale of PokerStars to Amaya. Department of Justice in This settlement allowed PokerStars to return to the U. This act made it illegal for PokerStars to accept US players and illegal for US banks to process payments related to online poker.

PokerStars did react to this story by providing these studies with more comprehensive data sets to work with. Way too many bad beats regardless of which side of it you're on. Nevertheless, there is incentive to be even more profitable in seems free slot games las vegas casinos please highly competitive market, and PokerStars would not be the first online gambling service to increase profits by exploiting consumers.

I do feel the "random card generator" algorithm is not what it should be and does not deliver cards with the percentages over the long hall of a dealer with a shuffle machine.

I put money in and easily run it up to 3or 4 times my investment. How, and if, a client is favoring players? If the percentage of winning certain hands forums gambling las vegas not the same on ps then it must be rigged.

For that reason, it is very difficult to believe that PokerStars would rig games on a regular basis, and there is no concrete proof to suggest that PokerStars has done so.

I am amazed that they are operating at all, and have learned to do more research before helping a company profit.

Another point of concern for poker players considering PokerStars is that the company has never received accreditation from the Better Business Bureau. Keep in mind that PokerStars has no incentive to rig poker games outside of sponsored play.

PokerStars had a strong reputation ten years ago, but that all began to change in late when the U. To make this a complete and fully good analyze, will be extremely complicated.

And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to normal regularity? PokerStars was guilty — and when online poker became legalized in New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware, with the potential of California coming next, some laws had a bad actor clause — which disallowed PokerStars from entering the market since they were illegally operating in the US previously. Same m. The company was one of the driving factors in the meteoric success of its young industry, and always offered strong security measures and customer support.